Star Players and Team Effectiveness

As leaders in tech organizations, we're constantly on the hunt for top talent. The conventional wisdom is that the more star players we can recruit, the better our teams will perform. But is that really true? A fascinating study by researchers from Harvard Business School and Washington University in St. Louis challenges this assumption and offers some nuanced insights that could reshape how we think about building high-performing teams.

The Study

The researchers examined Wall Street equity research departments to investigate how the proportion of high-status "star" analysts in a group impacts overall team effectiveness. They were curious about whether simply assembling a team of individual stars translates into superior group performance, especially when the work requires collaboration.

To tackle this question, they analyzed data on analyst teams, controlling for individual performance, department size, specialization, and firm prestige. They looked at how the proportion of star analysts in a team related to the team's perceived effectiveness by clients who use their research.

What they found

The results were eye-opening. Teams did benefit from having some star players, but only up to a point. As the proportion of stars increased, the marginal benefit decreased. Even more surprisingly, when the percentage of stars got too high, it actually started to hurt team performance. This effect was particularly pronounced when the star analysts were concentrated in a small number of sectors, suggesting that having too many experts with overlapping knowledge can be problematic.

So what does this mean for us as tech leaders?

First, it reinforces that individual talent matters - having some stars on the team is beneficial. However, it also cautions against the "more is better" mentality when it comes to recruiting top performers.

There seems to be a sweet spot where additional star power starts to yield diminishing returns and can even become counterproductive.

The study suggests that stars may compete for status within the team, hindering collaboration and integration of work. This aligns with what many of us have experienced - when you put too many big egos in a room, it can be challenging to get them working effectively together.

As we build our teams, we should aim for a balanced mix of star performers and solid team players. We need to foster an environment where high-status individuals are motivated to collaborate rather than compete internally.

This might involve carefully structuring teams to avoid too much overlap in expertise, creating interdependencies that encourage cooperation, and actively promoting a culture of teamwork alongside individual excellence.

Ultimately, this research reminds us that team effectiveness is about more than just individual talent.

It's about finding the right combination of skills, fostering productive collaboration, and creating an environment where the whole truly becomes greater than the sum of its parts. As we navigate the competitive landscape of tech talent, keeping this nuanced view in mind can help us build teams that are not just star-studded, but genuinely high-performing.

Want to have access to more such insights based on management research? Try Insights by Voohy.

Exclusive Offer just for subscribers of this newsletter: Use the code SUBSCRIBED for a 10% discount on any Voohy paid plan.